Saturday, March 31, 2018

बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद में मांसाहार का विधान नहीं है



शंका -क्या बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद में मांसाहार का विधान है?
समाधान
बृहद अरण्यक उपनिषद् ६/४/१८ में मांसाहार के विषय में शंका आती है कि उत्तम संतान कि प्राप्ति के लिए मांस ग्रहण करना चाहिए।
मांसमिक्षमोदनं मांसौदनम्. तन्मांसनियमार्थमाह – आक्षौण वा मांसेन. उक्षा सेचनसमर्थः पुंगवस्तवीयं मांसम्। ॠरिषभस्ततोSप्यधिकवयास्तदीयमार्षभं मांसम्।
शंकराचार्य द्वारा किये गए अर्थ से मांस का ग्रहण करना प्रतीत होता है।
जबकि इसका अर्थ पंडित सत्यव्रत जी सिद्धान्तालंकार अपने एकादषोपनिषद प्रथम संस्करण के पृष्ठ 585 में इस प्रकार से करते है-
जो चाहे कि मेरा पुत्र पंडित हो, प्रख्यात हो, सभा में जाने वाला हो, प्रिय वाणी बोलने वाला हो, सब वेदों का ज्ञाता हो, पूरी आयु भोगे, तो माष अर्थात उड़द के साथ चावल पकवाकर पति-पत्नी दोनों खावें। ऐसा करने से वे दोनों ऐसा पुत्र उत्पन्न करने में समर्थ होते हैं जो शरीर में बैल के समान और ज्ञान में ऋषियों के समान होता है। इस स्थल में 'माँसौदन की जगह माषोदान पाठ ठीक है। दही, घी, चावल, तिल आदि के प्रकरण में उड़द प्रकरणसंगत है, मांस सर्वथा असंगत है। -

उपनिषद् के इस वचन में तीन पदों 'माँसौदन', 'औक्ष्णन' , 'ऋषभेण' को लेकर मुख्य रूप से भ्रान्ति होती है।
पंडित जे.पी. चौधरी काव्यतीर्थ अपनी पुस्तक वेद और पशुयज्ञ प्रथम संस्करण के पृष्ठ 45-46 में माँसौदन का अर्थ उड़द और चावल करते है, औक्ष्णन और 'ऋषभेण से 'ऋषभक नामक औषधि का ग्रहण करते है।
गर्भावस्था में चरक ऋषि मद, मांस भक्षण का अध्याय 4 मेंस स्पष्ट रूप से निषेध करते है। सुश्रुत भी शरीराध्याय में गर्भावस्था में दूध के साथ चावल, भात, तिल, उड़द दी आहार को ग्रहण करने का आदेश देते हैं।
अथर्ववेद 3/23/4 में वेद भगवान आरोग्यवृद्धक ओषधि के रूप में ऋषभ के बीजों के प्रयोग का सन्देश देते है।
पंडित शिवशंकर शर्मा काव्यतीर्थ अपने बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद् के भाष्य में सम्पूर्ण प्रकरण को इस प्रकार से समझाते है-
जो कोई चाहे की मेरा पुत्र कपिल वर्ण- पिंगल हो और दो वेदों का ज्ञानी बन सम्पूर्ण आयु को प्राप्त करे तो दंपत्ति दही के साथ ओदन बनवा कर घृत मिलाकार दंपत्ति खावे मन चाही संतान उत्पन्न होगी। ६/४/१५
जो कोई चाहे की मेरा पुत्र श्याम वर्ण- रक्ताक्ष हो और तीन वेदों का ज्ञानी बन सम्पूर्ण आयु को प्राप्त करे तो दंपत्ति जल के साथ चरुनवा घृत मिलाकर दंपत्ति खावे मन चाही संतान उत्पन्न होगी। ६/४/१६
जो कोई चाहे की मेरा कन्या पंडिता होवे और सम्पूर्ण आयु को प्राप्त करे तो दंपत्ति तिल के साथ ओदन बनवा कर घृत मिलाकार दंपत्ति खावे मन चाही संतान उत्पन्न होगी। ६/४/१७
जो कोई चाहे की मेरा पुत्र पंडित , सुनने के योग्य भाषण देने वाला हो और सब वेदों का ज्ञानी बन सम्पूर्ण आयु को प्राप्त करे तो दंपत्ति उड़द मिला कर घृत मिलाकार दंपत्ति खावे मन चाही संतान उत्पन्न होगी। ६/४/१८
यहाँ तिलौदन का अर्थ तिल आदि पदार्थ है। जिसके पश्चात मांसोदन आया है जिससे की मांस की प्रतीति होती हैं।यहाँ मांस का अर्थ पशु का मृत शरीर होने के स्थान पर जिससे मन प्रसन्न हो और जो शास्त्रों में माननीय हो उसे माँस कहते है होना चाहिए।
क्यूंकि इससे पूर्व के मन्त्रों में भी दही, जल , उरद आदि के साथ घृत का प्रयोग करने का विधान आता हैं।
आगे उक्ष शब्द आता हैं जिसका अर्थ सींचना है।
इससे यह सिद्ध होता है कि उपनिषद् में दंपत्ति को उत्तम पदार्थ ग्रहण करने का सन्देश है। नाकि मांस आदि के ग्रहण करने का।
सन्दर्भ बृहद अरण्यक उपनिषद्-शिवशंकर शर्मा काव्यतीर्थ। पृष्ठ- ८९६
इसके अतिरिक्त महात्मा नारायण स्वामी ( बृहद अरण्यक उपनिषद् भाष्य में), पंडित बुद्धदेव विद्यालंकार (पुस्तक-किसकी सेना में भर्ती होंगे? कृष्ण की या कंस की?), आचार्य रामदेव (भारतवर्ष का इतिहास-वैदिक तथा आर्ष पर्व, पंडित गुरुदत्त विद्यार्थी संस्मरण ), आर्यमुनि जी ( वैदिक काल का इतिहास) एवं डॉ शिवपूजन सिंह कुशवाहा (वेदी सिद्धांत मार्तण्ड) , में यही अर्थ करते हैं।
इस प्रकार से यह सिद्ध होता है कि बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद् में मांसाहार का कोई विधान नहीं हैं।
डॉ विवेक आर्य

हनुमान जयंती निमित्त हनुमंतांच्या व्यक्तिमत्वाचं एक चिंतन मराठी लेख




हनुमान जयंती निमित्त हनुमंतांच्या व्यक्तिमत्वाचं एक चिंतन


अश्वत्थामा बलिर्व्यासौ हनुमानश्च विभीषण: !
कृप: परशुरामश्च सप्तैते चिरजीविन: !!


आज हनुमान जयंती. सप्तचिरंजीवांपैकी एक म्हणजे वीर हनुमंत ! नुकतीच रामनवमी साजरी झाली. खरंतर महाबली नि अतुलपराक्रमी नि आजीवन अखंड ब्रम्हचारी अशा श्रीरामचंद्रभक्त अंजनेय हनुमंताचं चरित्र आम्हांस ज्ञात आहेच पण तरीही त्या नरश्रेष्ठाचं व्यक्तिमत्व नक्की कसं होतं ह्याविषयी रामायणात फार विलोभनीय नि विलक्षण चिंतनीय असं वर्णन आलं आहे. आजकाल व्यक्तिमत्व विकास(Personality Development) हा एक परवलीचा शब्द झाला आहे. अगदी शाळकरी मुलांमध्येदेखील ह्याची प्रचंड आवड किंवा आंग्लभाषेतल्या शब्दाप्रमाणे "क्रेझ"आहे असं म्हटल्यास वावगं ठरणार नाही. ह्या व्यक्तिमत्व विकासासाठी सहस्त्रो रुपयांचे वर्ग लावण्यापेक्षा हनुमंताचं चरित्र वाचलं तरी ही आपल्याला बरंच काही शिकायला मिळेल नि व्यक्तिमत्व कसं असावं ह्याचं उत्तम उदाहरण हनुमंताच्या नि रामचंद्राच्या चिंतनातून नि कार्यातून आपल्याला पहायला मिळेलं. त्यासाठी हा लेखनप्रपंच !

रामायणातले किष्किंधा कांड सांगते की मर्यादा पुरुषोत्तम प्रभु श्रीरामचंद्र हे सीतेच्या हरणानंतर कबंधाच्या सुचनेनुसार सुग्रीवाचा शोध घेत असताना ऋष्यमुख पर्वतावर आले. तेंव्हा वालीच्या भयाने राज्यापासून दूर असेला सुग्रीव हा ह्या दोन नरश्रेष्ठांना पाहून किंचित आश्चर्यचकित नि शंकामग्न होउन थोड्या भयानेच का होईना पण आपल्या हनुमंत नावाच्या मंत्र्यांस ह्या दोन राजकुमारांची पारख करण्यास पाठवतो. तेंव्हा हनुमंत हे एका ब्राम्हणाचं रुप घेउन राम-लक्ष्मणांना भेटावयांस येतात नि त्यांस आत्मपरिचय देउन त्यांचा परिचय वगैरे विचारतात. हनुमंतांचं रामाबरोबरचे ते संभाषण जरी वाचलं तरी हनुमंतांच्या बुद्धिमत्तेचं दर्शन तर घडतंच पण त्यापेक्षाही एक दुत म्हणून कसं बोलावं ह्याचा एक आदर्शही प्रकट होतो. हनुमंताचं ते सुमधुर बोलणं ऐकल्यावर श्रीरामचंद्र लक्ष्मणांस हनुमंताचं जे वर्णन करतात ते खालीलप्रमाणे आहे. आणि हेच आजच्या आपला चिंतनाचा विषय आहे. श्रीरामचंद्र प्रभु म्हणतात की


नानृग्वेदविनीतस्य नायजुर्वेदधारिणम् |
नासामवेदविदुष: शक्यमेवं विभाषितुम् || २८ ||

अर्थ - ज्याला ऋग्वेदाचं शिक्षण मिळालेलं नाही, ज्यानं यजुर्वेदाचा अभ्यास केला नाही, जो सामवेदाचा विद्वान नाही, तो याप्रकारे सुंदर भाषेत वार्तालाप करु शकणार नाही.

नूनं व्याकरणं कृत्स्नमनेन बहुधा श्रुतम् |
बहु व्याहरतानेन न किंचिदपशाब्दितम् ||२९ ||

अर्थ - निश्तितपणानं ह्या हनुमंताने सर्व व्याकरणाचा अनेक वेळा बारकाईनं अभ्यास केला आहे. कारण इतका वेळ बोलत असुनही त्याच्या तोंडातून एकही अशुद्ध बोल बाहेर पडला नाही.


न मुखे नेत्रयोश्चापि ललाटे च भ्रूवोस्तथा |
अन्येष्वपि च सर्वेषु दोष: संविदित: क्वचित् ||३०||

अर्थ - संभाषणाच्या वेळी ह्याचे मुख, डोळे, कपाळ, भूवई तसेच अन्य सर्व अंगामधूनही एखादा दोष प्रकट झालेला आहे असं मला दिसला नाही !


अविस्तरमसंदिग्धमविलम्बितमव्ययम् |
उर:स्थं कण्ठगं वाक्यं वर्तते मध्यमस्वरम् ||३१||

अर्थ - यानं थोडक्यात पण अगदी स्पष्टपणं आपलं म्हणणं मांडलेलं आहे. ते समजण्यास नि:संदिग्ध होतं. थांबुन थांबुन किंवा शब्द आणि अक्षरे तोडून कुठलंही वाक्य त्यानं उच्चारलं नाही. कुठलंही वाक्य कर्णकटु वाटलं नाही. त्याची वाणी ह्रदयात मध्यमारुपाने स्थिर झाली आहे आणि कंठातून वैखरी रुपाने प्रकट झाली आहे !


संस्कारक्रमसम्पन्नामद्भुतामविलम्बिताम् !
उच्चारयति कल्याणी वाचं ह्रदयहर्षिणीम् ||३२||

अर्थ - बोलताना याचा आवाज फार बारीकही येत नाही नि फार वरही जात नाही. मध्यम आवाजात त्यानं सर्व काही सांगितलं आहे !


अनया चित्रया वाचा त्रिस्थानव्यंजनस्थया |
कस्य नाराध्यते चित्तमुद्यतासेररेरपि ||३३||

अर्थ - ह्रदय, कंठ आणि मुर्धा ह्या तीन स्थानांकडून स्पष्ट रुपानं अभिव्यक्त होणारी ह्याची ही चित्रवतवाणी ऐकुन कुणाचं चित्त प्रसन्न होणार नाही? वध करण्यासाठी म्हणून तलवार उचललेल्या शत्रुचं ह्रदय देखील ह्या वाणीनं बदलु शकेल !


एवंविधो यस्य दुतो न भवेत् पार्थिवस्य तु |
सिद्ध्यन्ति हि कथं तस्य कार्याणां गतयोsनघ ||३४||

अर्थ - हे निष्पाप लक्ष्मणा, ज्या राजांपाशी ह्यासारखे दुत नसतील, त्यांची कार्य सिद्धी कशी होउ शकेल बरे???

किष्किंधा कांड - वाल्मीकि रामायण - सर्ग तीन -  श्लोक संख्या २८ ते ३४


प्रत्यक्ष श्रीरामचंद्राच्या तोंडुन पहिल्याच भेटीत हनुमंताबद्दलचं हे चिंतन ऐकल्यावर हनुमंताचं व्यक्तिमत्व किती विलक्षण प्रभावशाली असेल ह्याची आपण केवळ कल्पनाच करु शकतो. पहिल्याच भेटीत श्रीरामचंद्र हे बोलतात ! काय आश्चर्य आहे !

बुद्धिमतां वरिष्ठं अशा हनुमंतांनी सर्व वेदांचा सुक्ष्म रीतीने अभ्यास केला होता नि त्यांचं आचरण पण तसंच होतं. व्याकरणाचा पण त्यांचा अभ्यास आहे. म्हणजे वानर देखील त्यावेळी वेदांचा अभ्यास करत होते. मग तथाकथित स्त्री-क्षुद्रांना नि तथाकथित बहुजन समाजाला वेद नाकारण्याचा प्रश्न येतोच कुठे??? किती दिवस आम्ही हा खोटी धारणा बाळगणार आहोत की हिंदु धर्मात वेदांचा अभ्यास फक्त विशिष्ट जातींपुरता होता नि आहे म्हणून???मधील काळात तो नाकारला गेला असेल तर ते पापच आहे नि निंदनीयच आहे.

रामचंद्रांचा देखील वेदांचा नि संस्कृत व्याकरणाचा अभ्यास होता नि ते देखील त्यात पारंगत असुन रत्नपारखी होते हे किती विलक्षण आहे. असो ! पुढे श्रीरामचंद्र म्हणतात की हनुमंत हे बोलताना कुठेही तुटकतुटक किंवा असंबद्ध किंवा अशुद्ध बोलत नाहीत. चेहरा किंवा अंगप्रत्यंगावरचे हावभाव किंवा हालचाल देखील किती आदर्श नि आचरणीय आहे. हनुमंताची वाणी ह्रदयात मध्यमारुपाने नि कंठात वैखरी रुपाने स्थिर आहे कारण योगशास्त्रानुसार वाणीचे जे प्रकार आहेत, त्यामध्ये मध्यमा, वैखरी, परा नि पश्यंती असे प्रकार आहेत. त्यातही हनुमंत हे पारंगत आहेत हे सिद्ध होतं. कारण त्यांचा आवाजही फार वर किंवा खाली नसुन मध्यम होता. त्यामुळे श्रीरामचंद्र म्हणतात की ह्याची वाणी ऐकुन एखादा शस्त्रधारी देखील आपलं शस्त्र खाली ठेवेल. इतकी विलक्षण सुंदर नि कर्णमधुर वाणी हनुमंतांची आहे. असा मंत्री ज्याच्या जवळ असेल त्याची कार्यसिद्धी झाल्याशिवाय राहील का???

व्यक्तिमत्वाचं ह्यापेक्षा उत्तम उदाहरण शोधायची आवश्यकता आहे का ??? वेदांचा नि संस्कृत व्याकरणाचा अभ्यास जर वानर देखील करत असतील तर आम्हा मनुष्यांना तो आज का एवढा अस्पृश्य झालाय??? किती करंटे आहोत आम्ही भारतीय??? दुर्दैवी ते आणखी कोण???


रामायणात इतर ठिकाणचे वर्णन

मुळ वाल्मीकि रामायणात हनुमंताचे जे वर्णन आले आहे, ते वाचले की मन अक्षरश: थक्क होते. ते , बुद्धिमतां वरिष्ठं तर आहेतच पण त्याहीपेक्षा सर्वात महत्वाचे म्हणजे त्यांचा प्रखर इंद्रियसंयम म्हणजे कडकडीत असं आजीवन अखंड ब्रम्हचर्य ! ब्रम्हचर्याचं सामर्थ्य हे हनुमंताशिवाय अन्यत्र कुठेच फारसं प्रकट झालेलं नाही. महाभारतातल्या भीष्माचार्यांचं उदाहरण तसं जरी असलं तरीही हनुमंतांचं उदाहरण हे विलक्षण प्रेरणादायी आहे. समर्थ देखील म्हणतात की


मुखी राम त्या काम बाधु शकेना |
गुणे इष्ट धारिष्ट्य त्या हे चुकेना |
महाभक्त शक्त कामास मारी |
जगीं धन्य तो मारुती ब्रम्हचारी |

महर्षी वाल्मीकि स्पष्ट म्हणतात की

न भुमौ नान्तरिक्षे वा ना नाम्बरे नामरालये |
नाप्सु वा गतिसंगं ते पश्यामि हरीपुंगव: |

मारुतीसारखा कुणी जलचरात नाही, भूमीवर नाही, अंतरिक्षात नाही, अंबरात नाही, स्वर्गातही नाही !


जगद्गुरु तुकोबाराय तर स्पष्टच म्हणतात

बाप माझा ब्रम्हचारी | मातेसमान अवघ्या नारी |

सुग्रीव सीताशोधाच्यावेळी हनुमंतांना उद्देशुन म्हणतो की

"हे हनुमंता, तुला असुर, गंधर्व, नाग, मनुष्य, राजे लोकांचं ज्ञान आहे. लोकपालांसह चौदा भुवने, एकवीस स्वर्गांचे तुला ज्ञान आहे. सागरांसह पर्वताचं तुला ज्ञान आहे. हे मारुती तुझी अकुंठीत गती, तुझा वेग, तेज व स्फुर्ती हे सर्व सद्गुण तुझ्यात परिपुर्ण आहेत. या भुमंडलात तुझ्या सारखा तेजस्वी दुसरा कुणीही नाही."

हनुमंत हे आजीवन अखंड ब्रम्हचारीच !

कुठल्या तरी थोतांड पुराणामध्ये की पराशर नामक कुठल्या तरी संहितेमध्ये की स्मृतीमध्ये म्हणे हनुमंताचा सूर्यकन्येशी विवाह आहे म्हणे. काहीही कथा वाट्टेल त्या रचायच्या नि निंदा करायची आपल्या राष्ट्रपुरुषांची. जरा तरी लज्जा वाटायला हवी एका नैष्ठिक ब्रह्मचार्यावर हा आरोप करताना.

ब्रम्हचर्याचे दोन प्रकार आहेत. एक नैष्ठिक (उपकुर्वाण) ब्रम्हचर्य नि दुसरे गार्हस्थ्य ब्रम्हचर्य ! विवाह करुन देखील केवळ स्वस्त्रीशी तेदेखील शास्त्रात सांगितल्याप्रमाणे संसार करणे देखील गार्हस्थ्य ब्रम्हचर्याचे उदाहरण आहे. आजीवन अखंड ब्रम्हचारी भीष्माचार्यांनी महाभारतात धर्मराज युधिष्ठिराला उपदेश करताना गार्हस्थ्य ब्रम्हचर्याची व्याख्या सांगितली आहे. असो ! याज्ञवल्क्यस्मृतीमध्ये ब्रम्हचर्याची व्याख्या अशी केली आहे की

कर्मणा मनसा वाचा सर्वावस्थासु सर्वदा |
सर्वत्र मैथुनत्यागौ ब्रम्हचर्यं प्रचक्षते |

अंत्यबिंदु निषेकस्तु मैथुनम् |

अथर्वेवेद पण स्पष्ट सांगतो की

ब्रम्हचर्येण तपसा देवा मृत्युमुपाघ्नत |
इन्द्रौ हि ब्रम्हचर्येण देवेभ्य: स्वराभरत |
(अथर्ववेद)

अर्थ - ब्रम्हचर्याच्या जोरावरच देवतांनी मृत्युवर विजय मिळवला. इंद्राने देखील ब्रम्हचर्यानेच देवांचं राजपद मिळवलं.

भगवान शंकर देखील म्हणतात

सिद्धे बिन्दौ महादेवि किं न सिद्ध्यति भूतले |
यस्य प्रसादान्महिमा ममाप्येतादृशौ भवेत् |

न तपस्तप इत्याहुर्ब्रम्हचर्यं तपोत्तमम् |
उर्ध्वरेता भवेद्यस्तु स देवो न तु मानुष: |

ब्रम्हचर्यांचा महिमा यापेक्षा आणखी गायची आवश्यकता आहे काय? हनुमंत हे तर ब्रम्हचर्याचे मुर्तिमंत उदाहरण आहे. कारण रामायणात स्पष्ट उल्लेख आहे की हनुमंत हे आजीवन अखंड ब्रह्मचारीच होते. ज्ञानोबाराय म्हणतात

कर्मे हनुमंत उदरी कांसोटा | कर्मे शुकदेव गर्भिकष्टा |


हनुमंताचा कुठलाही मुलगा वगैरे नाहीये.

लंपट लोकांनी रामायणाच्या नावाखाली काहीही वाट्टेल कथा जोडलेल्या आहेत. म्हणे मकरध्वज मगरीला जन्मला. लाज कशी वाटत नाही रे निर्लज्जांनो?

हिंदुंना परधर्मीय शत्रुंची आवश्यकताच काय? हे असे पौराणिक प्रवृत्तीचे आहेत ना. असो.

तर अशा ह्या नरश्रेष्ठांस कोटी कोटी प्रणाम !!!


महाबली, अतुपराक्रमी, चतुर्वेदांचे जाणकार पवनसुत अंजनेय श्रीरामदुत हनुमान की जय ! सियांवर श्रीरामचंद्र की जय !! हिंदुधर्मकी जय !!! हिंदुराष्ट्रकी जय !!!


भवदीय,

तुकाराम चिंचणीकर

देशभक्त बटुकेश्वर दत्त जिन्हें आजादी के बाद मिली गुमनाम जिंदगी



देशभक्त बटुकेश्वर दत्त: जिन्हें आजादी के बाद मिली गुमनाम जिंदगी

देश की आजादी के लिए तमाम पीड़ा झेलने वाले क्रांतिकारी एवं स्वतंत्रता सेनानी बटुकेश्वर दत्त का जीवन भारत की स्वतंत्रता के बाद भी दंश, पीड़ाओं, और संघर्षों की गाथा बना रहा और उन्हें वह सम्मान नहीं मिल पाया जिसके वह हकदार थे। आजादी की खातिर 15 साल जेल की सलाखों के पीछे गुजारने वाले बटुकेश्वर दत्त को आजाद भारत में रोजगार मिला एक सिगरेट कंपनी में एजेंट का, जिससे वह पटना की सड़कों पर खाक छानने को विवश हो गये।
 बाद में उन्होंने बिस्कुट और डबलरोटी का एक छोटा सा कारखाना खोला, लेकिन उसमें काफी घाटा हो गया और जल्द ही बंद हो गया। कुछ समय तक टूरिस्ट एजेंट एवं बस परिवहन का काम भी किया, परंतु एक के बाद एक कामों में असफलता ही उनके हाथ लगी।
 दत्त के जीवन के इन अज्ञात पहलुओं का खुलासा नेशनल बुक ट्रस्ट द्वारा प्रकाशित किताब (बटुकेश्वर दत्त, भगत सिंह के सहयोगी) में हुआ है। अनिल वर्मा द्वारा लिखी गयी यह संभवत: पहली ऐसी किताब है, जो उनके जीवन का प्रामाणिक दस्तावेज होने के साथ-साथ स्वतंत्रता संघर्ष और आजादी के बाद जीवन संघर्ष को उजागर करती है।
 बटुकेश्वर दत्त के 1964 में अचानक बीमार होने के बाद उन्हें गंभीर हालत में पटना के सरकारी अस्पताल में भर्ती कराया गया। इस पर उनके मित्र चमनलाल आजाद ने एक लेख में लिखा, क्या दत्त जैसे कांतिकारी को भारत में जन्म लेना चाहिए, परमात्मा ने इतने महान शूरवीर को हमारे देश में जन्म देकर भारी भूल की है। खेद की बात है कि जिस व्यक्ति ने देश को स्वतंत्र कराने के लिए प्राणों की बाजी लगा दी और जो फांसी से बाल-बाल बच गया, वह आज नितांत दयनीय स्थिति में अस्पताल में पड़ा एडियां रगड़ रहा है और उसे कोई पूछने वाला नहीं है।
 इसके बाद सत्ता के गलियारों में हड़कंप मच गया और आजाद, केंद्रीय गृहमंत्री गुलजारी लाल नंदा और पंजाब के मंत्री भीमलाल सच्चर से मिले। पंजाब सरकार ने एक हजार रुपए का चेक बिहार सरकार को भेजकर वहां के मुख्यमंत्री केबी सहाय को लिखा कि यदि वे उनका इलाज कराने में सक्षम नहीं हैं तो वह उनका दिल्ली या चंडीगढ़ में इलाज का व्यय वहन करने को तैयार हैं।
 बिहार सरकार की उदासीनता और उपेक्षा के कारण क्रांतिकारी बैकुंठनाथ शुक्ला पटना के सरकारी अस्पताल में असमय ही दम तोड़ चुके थे। अत: बिहार सरकार हरकत में आयी और पटना मेडिकल कॉलेज में ड़ॉ मुखोपाध्याय ने दत्त का इलाज शुरू किया। मगर उनकी हालत बिगड़ती गयी, क्योंकि उन्हें सही इलाज नहीं मिल पाया था और 22 नवंबर 1964 को उन्हें दिल्ली लाया गया।
 दिल्ली पहुंचने पर उन्होंने पत्रकारों से कहा था, मुझे स्वप्न में भी ख्याल न था कि मैं उस दिल्ली में जहां मैने बम डाला था, एक अपाहिज की तरह स्ट्रेचर पर लाया जाउंगा। उन्हें सफदरजंग अस्पताल में भर्ती किया गया। पीठ में असहनीय दर्द के इलाज के लिए किए जाने वाले कोबाल्ट ट्रीटमेंट की व्यवस्था केवल एम्स में थी, लेकिन वहां भी कमरा मिलने में देरी हुई। 23 नवंबर को पहली दफा उन्हें कोबाल्ट ट्रीटमेंट दिया गया और 11 दिसंबर को उन्हें एम्स में भर्ती किया गया।
 बाद में पता चला कि दत्त बाबू को कैंसर है और उनकी जिंदगी के चंद दिन ही शेष बचे हैं। भीषण वेदना झेल रहे दत्त चेहरे पर शिकन भी न आने देते थे।
 पंजाब के मुख्यमंत्री रामकिशन जब दत्त से मिलने पहुंचे और उन्होंने पूछ लिया, हम आपको कुछ देना चाहते हैं, जो भी आपकी इच्छा हो मांग लीजिए। छलछलाई आंखों और फीकी मुस्कान के साथ उन्होंने कहा, हमें कुछ नहीं चाहिए। बस मेरी यही अंतिम इच्छा है कि मेरा दाह संस्कार मेरे मित्र भगत सिंह की समाधि के बगल में किया जाए।
 लाहौर षडयंत्र केस के किशोरीलाल अंतिम व्यक्ति थे जिन्हें उन्होंने पहचाना था। उनकी बिगड़ती हालत देखकर भगत सिंह की मां विद्यावती को पंजाब से कार से बुलाया गया। 17 जुलाई को वह कोमा में चले गये और 20 जुलाई 1965 की रात एक बजकर 50 मिनट पर दत्त बाबू इस दुनिया से विदा हो गये। उनका अंतिम संस्कार उनकी इच्छा के अनुसार, भारत-पाक सीमा के करीब हुसैनीवाला में भगत सिंह, राजगुरू और सुखदेव की समाधि के निकट किया गया।
डॉ विवेक आर्य
( जरा सोचिये आज़ादी के पश्चात विशेष रूप से गैर कांग्रेसी क्रांतिकारी इस भेदभाव के शिकार क्यूँ हुए?)

Aryasamaj and its activities in Hyderabad





Arya Samaj, founded in 1875 at Bombay by Maharishi Dayanand Saraswathi, has been hailed as one of the most potential and dynamic socio-religious movements of the day. It had a great impact on the life and thinking of the people particularly of the Hindus in the 19th and 20th centuries. According to Dr.K.P.Jaiswal, "The foundation of the Arya Samaj marked the beginning of vital changes in the social, religious,educational and national life of the vast majority of the people of India, as well as among the followers of the various faiths of the world."

Speaking on the role of Arya Samaj, Yogi Arvind Ghosh of Pondichery said,

"Dayanand was the real harbinger of the Indian Renaissance which opened up new directions and fresh hopes for millions of people who were groaning under the worst kind of slavery resulting from social, religious, cultural and political decadence."
In the light of the above statements the role of the Arya Samaj during the latter part of the reign of the last Nizam, Osman Ali Khan becomes very clear. The Arya Samaj in Hyderabad gave an impetus to the political awakening and paved the way for political emancipation at Hyderabad.

The political problems in Hyderabad related mainly to injustice of the minority rule over the majority. The minority of the ruler's community aspired to grow in strength through religious planks. Proselytizing the members of the majority community was one of the easy means to add to their own numbers. This was quite justified as long as the means are fair and merely persuasive. But when unfair means were employed the situation became quite explosive. The Arya Samaj in Hyderanbad state was founded in 1880 in Dharur Taluk of Beed district which acted as head office to guide its activities. In 1892, the Arya Samaj of Hyderabad was started in Residency area, later renamed as Sultan Bazar. The first President here was Pandit Kamata Prasadji Misra.

The teachings of the Arya Samaj had penetrated long ago into Hyderabad even before the dawn of the 20th century. But its impact was felt from the time Pandit Keshava Rao Koratkar, a great patriot and lawyer was elected the President of Arya Samaj in Hyderabad and he continued to remain at its helm 1932. He infused great vigour into the activities of Arya Samaj. He established many branches of Arya Samaj throughout the state and helped the spread of education through libraries and schools.

The satyarth Prakash of Arya Samaj was rendered into Telugu in 1921. They even rendered financial help to movements outside Hyderabad like the Moplah rebellion in Malabar. Their activities attracted an enthusiastic band of workers who vowed to protect the interests of the majority.

The Ganesh Utsav, to celebrate the birthday of the popular Hindu God, Ganesh was started in Maharastra by the great Revolutionary leader, Bai Gangadhar Tilak. It served as an effective means of public awakening through the media of songs, lectures and melas.
In 1895, for the first time in Hyderabad, Ganesh festival was held at Shah Ali Banda and Chaderghat and it evoked a good response. The festival at Chadharghat was organized entirely by students. This greatly helped in rousing public opinion. They also provided a training ground for workers in constructive social action.Due to the influence of the Razakkars on the Nizam, a number of restrictions were brought on the Hindus by the government. L.B.Phatak the editor of Maratha weekly,

Nizam Vijay, had brought out a brochure in 1931 in English under the title "Religious Disabilities of Hindus in the Hyderabad State". The facts below are from that brochure. A circular was issued by the government regarding religious celebrations, "...The Dasara is a great festival for the Hindus in which music processions form a leading part. Its character is jubilant, but it may synchronies with Moharrum which has a melancholy character.

Therefore the government issues the following circular dated 13th Aban, 1326F, 1916 By Order of HEH the Nizam's government according to which All Hindus of Hyderabad city and of the districts should perform their worship without any sort of music. Batkamma (goddess) should not be brought out and Hindus should not play music even in their household temples".

As a result of such restrictions, tempers rose on the side of the majority community. Often it led to riots between the two communities. One of the earliest riots during Osman Ali Khan's reign was the riots at Gulbarga, and this incident was conveyed to the Secretary of State in London by the Vice roy (Foreign and Political department) in Simla through a Telegram. The subject of the Telegram read 'Hindu Mohamadan Riots at Gulbarga in the Nizam's dominions'.

"On11th August, a Hindu procession passed a mosque during prayers. The Mohammedans objected and the Procession was turned back by magistrates' orders.The mob was dispersed by Police after some stone throwing. The next day the Mohammedan religious is said to have been insulted while a Mohamedan procession was passing a Hindu temple... Riots got out of hand. Police Superintendent was shot and in the end police dispersed the mob by fire, killing one and wounding seven. Nizam on 19th issued a  Firmanappointing a commission of enquiry. It is alleged that tense atmosphere had been created by Muslim proselytism.... Accounts in Times of India allege Mohameddans to have been aggressors and to have deliberately damaged their mosques with a view of exciting Mohammedan feeling against Hindus.
Apparently practically all the temples in the town were raided and damaged and idols destroyed... The government is undertaking repairs to temples and mosques."

There was strange religious activity started by a Muslim by name Siddiq Dindarin 1929. He declared himself to be as the Avtar of Chenna Basweshwar held in high regard by Lingayats. Siddiq Dindar said that Islam was the modern form of the preachings of Chenna Basweshwar. He delivered speeches belittling the Avtars of Rama and Krishna and irritated the feelings of the Hindus. Sri Mangala Dev, a preacher of the Arya Samaj was invited to counteract the harangues of Siddiq Dindar.

Another learned scholar, Pandit Ramachandra Dehlavi who had read the orignal Quran and its commentaries also came to Hyderabad.' This propaganda on both the sides Telegram Rno, 1350-8 dated 28* August 1924, dispatched at 3-30 p.m. in F.No. 84(2) poll. 1924 (Foreign Political)

Pandit Ramachandra Dehlavi was considered the Prince among Preachers. Since his speeches made a great impact there was great pressure on the State authorities to somehow implicate the Pundit and curtail his influence on the Hindu and Muslim population of the State. On the third day of his meeting, he was served summons at 9.30 p.m. signed by the Subjudge at Bidar requiring him to answer a charge of insult to Islam on the basis of a lecture delivered at Halikhcd in September 1933. The news of his prosecution created a great sensation all over India. A telegram was sent by Sri Narayan Swamiji, President of the league to HEH the Nizam of Hyderabad and another letter on the same subject was addressed to Professor. M.Sudhakar, Secretary of the League. Because of began to embitter mutual relations. The followers of Siddiq believed to be five hundred strong wore the green turban of Muslim divines, the saffron robe of Hindu Sadhus and beard in the style of the Sikhs. When the situation in a village grew tense, they led the Muslims against the Hindus. Siddiq increased his proselytizing activities unchecked 

 The Hindus on January 10th 1932, submitted a petition to the Nizam tocheck his activities. When the opposition became too strong, the Nizam's government imposed some kind of restriction on Sidiq's activities but he continued to function till 1948. Though the Razakkars looked upon the Deendars with contempt, they tolerated them as convenient allies for the terrorization of the Hindus . Another circular issued requires that no processions even those organized in connection with religious
ceremonies; could be conducted without the previous sanction of the Ecclesiastical Department. Circulars were issued to ban music to be played in front of a mosque. Another circular denies Hindus the right of constructing new temples and of repairing the old ones, whereas the states funds principally drawn from the Hindu population are made available for the erection, maintenance and upkeep of mosques, both in Hyderabad and outside. The Hindus were also not allowed to look after their educational and cultural interests.

"The state controls the entire education of its people and neglects the cultural interest of the Hindus as
against those of the Muslims which it fostered with special care and religious zeal."
the agitation launched against the prosecution, the Nizam's government dropped the case proposed to be filed against him. But the Pandit was deported. 

Accoring to Pandit Narendraji in his book, Jeevan Ki Doop Chai\ Hyderabad 1998, "Deendar wrote a book, "Sarvaare Aallaam' in which he ridiculed Yogeshwar Krishna and the goddesses.

All the rules regarding private schools, public meetings were published by the Standing Committee in the Hyderabad Peoples Educational Conference.  There was glaring injustice in representation of different communities in legislatures and civil services. They were not based on size of the population. In the Indian States Journal of 6 th May 1931, there appeared a note on recruitment to civil services.The note gave a picture of the pattern of application, nomination and selection
of candidates. 441 Muslims had applied as against 91 Hindus. From among them,275 muslims and 54 Hindus were nominated. Ultimately 34 Muslims and four Hindus were selected.The lopsided policy of the Nizam's government and their efforts to increase the number of minority at the expense of majority was questioned and checked by the AryaSamaj. Thus, the Nizam's government changed their attitude towards Arya Samaj and began to place a number of impediments before it. It grew so much that even the normal functioning of Arya Samaj had become impossible. They failed to secure the legitimate rights of religious worship and practice."
The Nizam's government began to impose restriction on the Arya Samaj preachers.
One of the first victims was Pandit Chandra Bhanu. He was served a deportation order by the State on 17th September 1932. Due to such injustice they began the constitutional fight with the Nizam's government. It was a fight between patience on one side and persecution on the other. They lodged their protests initially through Extract from the minutes of Hyderabad Civil Service Committee meeting held on 17th Khurdad, 134 If in A.P.State Archives.
" According to V.Yashoda Devi in her article, "Social and Religious reform Movements in A.P. in the 19th and 20"
"Unlike the Brahma Samaj, the Arya Samaj was revivalist in nature. They also undertook earnestly the work of social reform. The missionaries of Arya Samaj like Adipudi Somanatha Rao were engaged in receiving converted Christians and Muslims into the fold of Hinduism through a purification ceremony. p365 This probably irked the Nizam's government.

The resolutions, memorials and representations. They were finally driven to utter helplessness and desperation. The Nizam's government would often bring a last minute ban on the anniversary
celebration planned by the Arya Samaj much in advance. They were not allowed on most occasions to go on a procession. When the grievances of the Aryas increased, the President Mahatma Narayan Swami submitted a memorial dated 9th August 1934, to his Exalted Highness seeking his personal and gracious intervention for the redressing of 


Arya Samaj grievances. He explained in detail the role of the Arya Samaj as a universal organization and the decades of its service in the Nizam's government. He cited the services of some of them who worked as loyal and distinguished subjects of the Nizam. He lamented that a highly respected and renowned person like Pandit Ramachandra Dehlavi was treated so badly. He also pointed out that on the death of Pandit Keshava Rao, a judge of Hyderabad High Court of Judicature and pioneer of Arya Samaj, the Kotwal had served a notice that only a resolution on the occasion could be passed but
no speeches were to be delivered. Therefore it was quite natural that such an order should provoke resentment, foster discontent and produce needless heart burning. He urged the government not to make any restriction on entry of Arya Samaj preachers in the state. No discrimination be made, their religion and their logical literature may not be forfeited without proper enquiry

 After a long wait, a reply from the Political Member of HEH Nizam's government was sent. He wrote The case of Arya Samaj in Hyderabad from the Collections of Harishchandra Heda Gyanakumari Heda Samvai Seva Trust. 

Pandit Narendraji along with other distinguished addressed a gathering in Halikhed.
He said "paap se daro paapi se nahi"(fear sin, not the sinner) This had a great impact on the youth who were determined to fight the atrocities of the Nizam's .from , Narendraji,opcit.p.p.32,33.
An intimation regarding this memorial along with the copy of the same was also sent to the Political Secretary, Foreign and Political Department, Government of India. The memorial submitted by the president was not even acknowledged by the Nizam in  The Case Of Arya Samay opcit,p.8.

"I am now desired to inform you that there is no question of putting any restrictions in the way of the
followers of any religion or sect in Hyderabad state.HEH, the Nizam's government is and always has been impartial in the treatment it accords to its subjects, of whatever religion or sect or denomination they may be ... I am to add therefore that there has been no idea of putting the Arya Samajists in particular under any special disabilities."

But the debate between the Aryas and the Nizam's government continued as there were many misgivings on the part of the government. Shri Narayana Swami, Swami Swatantranand and Acharya Ramadev came in a deputation to see for themselves the conditions in the state. They were allowed to move freely and address meetings. But the moment they left the state all the restrictions were revived with greater vigour.

In 1935, the first Taluqdar of Bidar ruthlessly dealt with Arya Samaj at Nilanga. in Bidar district. Havan Kund and Samaj Mandir were desecrated and destroyed. The Samaj registered its protest against this sacrilegious action of the Taluqdar. Nawab Zuloader Jung, the Police Secretary of the State ordered the Taluqdar to reconstruct the Mandir and the Havan Kund, spending money from his own pocket.'
But the attitude of the government was very stiffened. The Samaj could not celebrate any functions, meetings relating to death anniversary and birth anniversaries dates of great personalities, religious ceremonies, fairs, Nagar kirtans, literary activities, conduct schools or have Havan Kund or unfurl 'OM' flags. After intensified endeavors, the Samaj was permitted to start an under weekly, Vaidic Adarsh in 1934.


But the fearless and frank tone of Pandit Narendraji in it displeased the government and its publication was stopped by a government order in 1935. In 1936, at Humnabad - Manik Nagar, the Arya Samaj workers had commenced their preaching work. A few mussalmans picked up a quarrel with a 'Nagar Kirtan' party and there was a scuffle and a clash. The police appeared on the scene encouraging the musalamans to chastise the Aryans. The two famous brothers Bansilal and Shamlal
and Pandit Narendra were arrested. At Umerga, a worker by name Ramachandra was found to have a copy of Satyartha Prakash. It was seized by the police as a seditious book. A Great agitation had to be made after which the Satyartha Pakash was returned to Ramachandra.

When the circular No.53 which forbade all meetings of every character was issued in 1937, the Arya Samaj protested against it by holding celebration without any prior sanction. That year, an Arya Samjist, Veda Prakash, was persuaded to accept Islam but on his stubborn rejection to do so he was murdered at Gunjoti. An All India Aryan Conference was held from 25 th to 29th December 1938 in
Sholapur now in Maharastra. The president of the session Sri Madhav Sri Hari Annay addressed the Nawabs and Rajahs saying that "in today's world they need the help of the people to govern and to hand over responsibility to them"
According to Rajandra in his book AsafJahis of Hyderabad, The Arya Samaj, which was basically a movement of religious reform, inevitably strayed into political territory'to take the cause of the majority community in Hyderabad which was living under unspeakable disabilities.

The Arya Samaj defied the order of the government in 1938 that their permission be sought before a Havan Kund was constructed anywhere. The resentment in the majority community and the high-handedness of the government led to a number of communal riots in the year 1938. • At Gulbarga, in 1938 riots burst out because a few drops of colored water soiled the dress of a Musalman during Holi celebration. Prominent Hindu local leaders were arrested and sentenced.
• The notorious Dhulpet communal riot took place in Hyderabad in 1938 when 21 active workers of Arya Samaj were arrested.
• A serious riot took place at Vidigir during the Dasara celebration in 1938 in which Shiv Shyamlal was arrested along with 20 colleagues. He died in Bidar jail. It is reported that some foul play was the cause of his death.
• To stop the activities of Pandit Narendra, the government arrested and sent him to Mannanoor.
During this period an open letter was written to Sir Akbar Hydari, the Premier of Hyderabad. Though initially he was very broad minded and benevolent he played into reactionary hands and thus had disappointed the people of Hyderabad. Excerpts from the letter which was published and printed are given below.

" Your Excellency, pardon me for the liberty but I believe even great men need sometime be told some plain home truths... you have an eye for merit and appreciate good work done by others, Although prejudiced against Arya Samajists, your sincere regard for the service rendered by them in plague and in influenza is well known ...You have never lost any opportunity to exercise your influence to utilize your position for the good of the Muslims... The yeomen contribution you have made to the perpetuation of Muslim stewardship of Hyderabad by the inauguration of the Osmania University cannot be equaled by any one before or after you...By the acquisition of the Railway you have opened fresh avenues of services for Muslims, who were in microscopic minority in the Railway services before acquisition by the Government ... The reasons for your change in attitude, Sir Akbar, can I think be traced to the last communal riots in Hyderabad. It is an open secret that you were surrounded by reactionaries during these riots. The whole blame for the riots was piled on the poor AryaSamajists and the Hindus by the Information Bureau. 

In trying to placate a small but loud section of the Muslim reactionaries, you did not do fair justice to a large section of the oppressed citizens. It would shatter the faith of any people in an administration which could tolerate the members of its militia to go about as Goondas rioting in the streets. Inspite of the repeated demands of the Hindu leaders for an impartial enquiry into the riots, and may I ask you a plain question, why did the Government shirk this inquiry? The Government only hauled up the leaders of Arya Samaj and prosecuted them for murder and rioting. The fair plea of the accused for an impartial jury was turned down and all the twenty-four arrested were sentenced to life imprisonment... I hope you are not unaware, Sir Akbar that the shattering of people's faith in its
administration leads to the overthrow of the latter... It is a pity you should have rejected the conciliatory proposals of Mr.Bhulabhai Desai for withdrawing these cases together with cases against Muslims. You did not also pay any heed to the very reasonable demand of the people for the liberal modification of the rules regarding public meetings. If these two things were done, I am sure people would have patiently waited for the promised reforms and any agitation for an accelerated pace of the reforms would have been only constitutional.
1 must end this arduous task, Sir Akbar by a summary review of the latest events. Whereas the banning of the government servants from communal organization both Muslim and Hindu was a broad gesture of impartiality on the part of your government its practical application lacked honesty when it could allow government servants like Bahadur Yar Jung and Moulvi Abdul Haq to continue their open communal and political agitation inside and outside Hyderabad... The ban on the Congress by accusing it of communalism inspite of its avowed non-communal character in outlook and
practice manifested how deeply you have played into the hands of reactionaries. The government can put down an agitation but how can it suppress the burning discontentment which is raging in and is bound to increase day by day among the masses!...Have the Lessons of History been lost on a statesman like you?...Lastly may I plead that it is not too late still and there are men who have yet faith in your personal statesmanship and who will willingly respond to the call for friendly reconciliation if a sufficient practical gesture is made from Government. May I trust this will be forthcoming?"

Obviously, no damage control was done on the part of the government and the 1938 Satyagraha by Arya Samajists was inevitable. The Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Delhi also wrote several times inviting the attention of the government but of no avail. As a last resort it was decided by them that a strong fight should be put up with the Hyderabad government without which the matters could not improve. The words of the Nizam and his actions hardly matched as far as his impartial rule over all subjects of his
dominion were concerned.

The year 1937 was the silver jubilee year of the Nizam's accession and one of the most jubilant gatherings seen for many years was the Jubilee Darbar held on the first night of the Jubilee celebrations, attended by Hyderabad princes and princesses, members of the Executive Council, noblemen, prominent citizens and many state guest among whom were a number Indian Ruling princes. At the Darbar, HEH the Nizam received an address from the 14 million subjects, tender, sincere and loyal felicitations on the occasion of the silver jubilee of his reign. The address read by Sir Kishan Pershad expressed the allegiance and loyalty of the subjects to the Nizam. The Nizam
in his reply assured that his life was dedicated to the welfare of his beloved subjects. He said, "To be their servant is a source of pride and distinction to me".( He also added, "Nothing can give me greater pleasure than to see as I see today that addresses on this occasion have been presented by subjects unitedly without distinction of class, sect or religion. This is a blessing which seldom falls to the lot of any ruler."

The good intentions of the ruler remained only on paper and speeches. Meanwhilethe League of the Arya Samaj took stock of the situation and opined that it could no longer can be ignored or disregarded. They demanded an early settlement of a number of grievances. Some of them are mentioned below.
1) Circular no.53 prohibiting public meeting should be cancelled.
2) Restrictions regarding religious ceremonies should be removed.
3) Circular prohibiting the opening of "Akharas" and private schools should be cancelled.
4) Cases relating to communal disturbances should be investigated by an impartial tribunal.
5) There should be complete freedom for the observance of Hindu and Arya festivals when these coincide with Muslim festivals.
6) No victimization of Aryas in state service should be allowed and they should have complete freedom for hoisting and flying OM flags on their houses and Arya Samaj temples.
Prohibitory orders were issued on Barrister N.F.Nariman, the well-known criminal lawyer of Bombay, who was called to defend the accused from the Aryas. His entry was banned on the extraordinary grounds of his political views.
When there was a spate of uncalled for murders of Aryas by Muslim fanatics, an open letter was written to Sir Akbar Hydari by the Secretary of Arya Samaj, Prof. Sudhakar. Extracts are given below.

"Dear Sir Akbar Hyderi,

Disquieting news of the murders of Arya Samajists by Muslim fanatics have created sensation all over Hindu- India. Ved Prakash was martyred at Gunjati, Dharam Prakash at Kalyani and Maha Deva at village Akolaga ... You have recently delivered your convocational sermon to Dacca university students, preaching against communalism. But have not the news of these murders the result of Muslim communalism and fanaticism reached your ears? ...An astute administrator like yourself is hardly expected to allow things to drift in the manner they are drifting. Please take steps to stop
this drift so that it may not become too late."
The Eastern Times, Hyderabad 19lh Feb 1937 special Jubilee Number, p.20

The Arya Samaj could not and would not also tolerate the Tabligh propagandaorganized and strengthened by the government.  The Arya Samaj in their meeting on 9th October 1938 declared Mahatma Narayan Swami as the First Dictator and his orders would be final. He was to be entrusted with the task of starting a mass movement of Satyagraha to redress their grievances in Hyderabad. He entered Hyderabad on 31st January 1939. But the police arrested him and drove him to Sholapur. But he offered Satyagraha again in 1939 at Gulbarga. He and his followers were arrested and sentenced to one years' rigorous imprisonment.

The second dictator was Shri Kanwar Chanda Kurana Sharada, who, with his batch,offered Satyagraha on 5th March, 1939, and later Shri Khushal Chand who assumed the name "Anand Swamy". He went with a batch of 154. The fourth dictator was Rajguru Dhurendra Shastri later it was Swami Dhruva Nand who led with a large following. Dhurendra Sastri and his 530 followers were sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. The fifth dictator was Pt. Vedvrata later Swami Abheda Nand and the sixth was Mahashaya Krishan. The seventh was Gyanendra. In addition to these leaders of the Satyagraha movement who were all well-known all-India figures, there were
other dictators and volunteers from Hyderabad itself. The names of the dictators are Shesha Rao, Dattatraya Prasad, Digambar Rao Shivangeerkar; Shanker Rao Patel, Andhori Nivritti Reddy, Ahmadpur, Digamber Rao Latkar, Ganpat Roa Kethle, Kalam. 

About 12,000 Satyagrahis were arrested of which 5,000 were Hyderabadis. Pandit Vinayak Rao Vidyalankar was nominated as the eighth dictator. He was about to offer They were freely allowed to, both forcibly and conciliatorily, convert people in prisons and schools, into Islam.

There were number of leaders and 'dictators' that emerged for the Aryas during this period, there was no death of Satya Grahis inspite of harsh repressive measure adopted by the government. In the book
Arya Samaj in Hyderabad, by Narandra a graphic detail of the ill treatment of the Satyagrahi prisoners in Jails is given . Against the apprehensions of all leaders of Arya Samaj the Satyagrahis remain disciplined and exercised great moderation.
Satyagraha with 8,000 Hyderabadi Satyagrahis on the 21st of July 1939. But the Nizam's Government announced certain administrative reforms and hence the Satyagraha was suspended.
This was followed by a number of arrests of Arya Samaj leaders. Some of them were 

1)On 5th March 1939 Kuwar Chandkaran Sharada along with 100 satyagrahis was arrested in Gulbarga He was later sentenced to one-year rigorous imprisonment.
2) On 22nd March 1939, Kushalchand was arrested in the Gulbarga railway station along with 160 Satyagrahis. Hewas sentenced to 18 months imprisonment in Gulbarga prison.
3) On 4 th April 1939, Dhurendra Shastry along with 501 satyagrahis was arrested.

More than 12,000 satyagrahis were actively involved in the struggle with the Nizam's government.
lnitially the Nizam's government was contemplating coming tosome understanding. But the leaders of the 'Anjuman Ittehad -ul-Muslimeen' prevented the government from doing so and the government had to retrace some of its steps.
Due to tremendous pressure exerted by the satyagrahis, the government instructed the Aryan authorities to send a deputy with whom they would discuss and clarify the reforms to be introduced. Almost all the demands of Arya Samaj were conceded to. On 8th August 1939, the declaration was made that the Arya Satyagraha had been suspended. The years following the Satyagraha, the Arya Samaj decided to take up constructive work. They decided to set up educational institutions called
Memorial High School on 20th July, 1940 and the foundation stone was laid on 20th September in the same year by Sri Ghanashyam Singh Gupta. The organizers yearned to have Hindi as the medium of the instruction in the High school, but they could not achieve their objective till 1948.

Speaking in a radio broadcast on 21st August 1989, Shri Brahmadatt Snathak on theHyderabad Satyagraha he said, "The Satyagraha launched in 1939 was not against the  Muslims but against the oppressive rule of the Nizam". He said in the Satyagrah, the Sikhs, Jains and even a few muslims participated. He said that even Sardar Patel admitted that the 1938-39 Satyagrah spearheaded by Arya Samaj prepared the way for the accession of Hyderabad ten years later. It was a test of fire and the Arya Samaj came out victoriously.

This satyagrah has been considered an important landmark in the history of Hyderabad freedom struggle and the government in recognition of it has been honouring those who bravely participated in it by granting pensions to them. Snathak in 1990, writes that a number of Satyagrahis came from outside Hyderabad also to join the Satyagraha. Leaders from Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Hyderabad and Gujarat emerged as 'dictators' in different phases of the Satyagraha. They put forth fourteen major demands before the Nizam's Government. Initially, the State Congress and All India Congress were critical of the Satyagrahabut when they saw the success it achieved the congratulatory messages poured in from all of them. Mahatma Gandhi also gave special commendation Brahmadatt concludes, "I was only 20 years old then and the only child of my parents, it gives great pride that the Satyagraha has been recognized by the Indian Government as a part of the National Freedom Struggle"

Regarding the reaction the of the Muslims in the state, the Muslims of Hyderabad inFebruary, 1939 submitted a memorandum to Sir Akbar Hydari pointing out the indifference of state towards the agitation started by the Arya Samaj and warning that if the movement was not suppressed within a fortnight they would come forward to combat the agitation on behalf of the state, and the ruler who belonged to the Muslims and not bother about the consequences that might follow.

The situation and attitude of the Nizam's government towards the Aryas had not improved and in a conference held at Udgir in 1942, 26 resolutions were adopted. They impressed upon the government that reforms were violated at every step and if the government did not try to retrieve these steps the Arya Samaj would not be held responsible for any of the consequences.
The government did not take any heed to this and the houses and shops of Hindus were attacked and burnt,Peaceful processions were shot at in many places like Bidar, Humnabad, Nagar Karnool , and Hingoli, Jogipetha and Tarkheda according to Pt. Narandra in his book. 

Between 1942 and 1945 five Aryan conferences were held in different parts of Nizam's dominions. It brought solidarity and unity among the Aryas. A conference was held at Udgir in 1942 under the Presidentship of Pandit Vinayak Rao Vidyalankar. Pandit Narendraji was the Secretary. The conference was held on 12th and 13th of February, and 26 resolutions were adopted. It impressed upon the Government that the agreements reached and terms laid down in the Reforms were
being violated at every step. If the Government did not try to retrieve these steps, the Arya Samaj shall have to gird up its loins to meet the situation and it would not be held responsible for any of the consequences. But the Government did not take any heed, as it was wont. At Aurad Shahjahni in Bidar district, the Muslims attacked the shops and houses of the Hindus and Aryans and burnt them when doors were closed. One person who showed some resistance was killed. Mahatma Gandhi ordered a sum of one thousand five hundred rupees to be sent to the aid of the sufferers. Even the Samaj collected Rs.2000/- for the same cause. Deshabandhu and other Aryan workers of the place were arrested and sentenced to long-term imprisonment. Permission was not granted for the annual celebrations at Chincholi and Gunjoti On 3rd March 1942, when the Aryan procession was peacefully passing at Humnabad, Sri Shivachandra and his three colleagues were shot dead by the Musalmans. At Nagarkarnool and Hingoli, a cruel assault was made on Hindus by the Muslims and the culprits were discovered by the police only among the Aryans who were later sentenced. The same miserable tragedies were enacted at Jogipetha and Tarakheda. On 10 th December 1942, the shops of the Hindus were looted at Gulbarga to ensure they were paralysed financially so that they might not patronise the Samaj activities. No steps were taken by the Government to punish the real wrong doers or to root out such tendencies. In 1943, the Arya Samaj celebrated the Aryan Conference at Nizamabad. Shri
Ganapat Kashinath Shastri was elected to preside. The same resolutions as in the previous conference were reiterated. But one very significant resolution related to the establishment of one hundred Pathashalas and volunteer corps which numbered 25,000. Sri Dattatreya Prasad's speech at the conference was found by the police as quite objectionable and action was launched against him in the court. Pandit Narenderji was also found guilty of a speech delivered by him at Gulbarga. Pandit
Naranderji was sentenced to one month's rigorous imprisonment. Unmindful of all these calamities, the Samaj established a Swadhyaya Mandal Study circle at Ghatkesar for training preachers and celebrated 26 annual functions at the branches in districts and held Vedic Saptahas at 29 places throughout the State.

The third annual conference of the Samaj was celebrated at Narayanpeth. Rai Suraj Chandji presided over the deliberations. The new feature of this conference was the celebration of Mahila Sammelan, Arya Kumar Sammelan, the Updeshak and Mantri Sammelan. This year the Sindh Muslim League had resolved to put a ban on the Satyartha Prakash. An All India agitation culminating in Satyagraha protected the against this fate. Hyderabad State Arya Samaj fully supported the protest movement.
A communal clash took place at Nizamabad on the occasion of the Dasera. The Arya Pratinidhi Sabha demanded that an investigation should be made to find out the culprits but the Government did not give up its negligent attitude. In 1944, the strength of Aryan missionaries rose to three hundred; the Pathashalas and the number of pupils receiving education also showed a commendable increase and therefore a new edition of the Telugu Satyartha Prakash was brought out.

In 1945, a training centre called Upadeshak Vidyalaya was started at Nalgonda.The trainees received coaching for carrying on the preaching work. Sri Badradev and Pandit Narendraji toured several places and collected a fund of Rs.7,000/- with which the Vidyalaya made a beginning.

The fourth Aryan Conference took place at Gulbarga on 22 nd, 23rd and 24th of April 1945, under the Presidentship of Rajha Narayan Lai Pitti. The police authorities were determinded to create some disturbance. In the very presence of the Police authorities Pandit Vinayak Rao, Shri Ganapati Shastri, Pandit Narenderji and a worker, Sri Hiralal were severely beaten. Pandit Narenderji suffered from a fracture in the leg.
Widespread resentment spread all over the State and the Police Department was compelled to degrade one Sub-Inspector of Police and four constables. Due to the illness of Narenderji, Sri Krishna Dutt worked as Secretary. Efforts were made to get the ban on entry into the state put on Arya Samaj leaders.

The fifth Aryan Conference was celebrated at Warangal in 1946. Pandit Vinayak Rao presided at the Conference and Shri Krishna Dutt was the secretary of the Conference. Pandit Narenderji was released and the ban put on his movements and speech was lifted.Sir Mirza Ismail assumed the Prime Ministership of Hyderabad and a hope for a better situation was expected. Permission was granted to start a weekly, "Aryabhandu". Many Arya Samajists languishing in jail for communal riots were
released. A minister of such liberal views could not continue in Hyderabad.Circumstances so conspired that he had to submit his resignation and leave Hyderabad.

On 15th August 1947, when India attained Independence, Hyderabad, was trying to assert its independence. It was during this time that the sixth annual conference of Arya Samaj took place at Jalna. It passed a resolution that the Nizam should integrate his dominions with the Indian Union and immediately allow the formation of a responsible government.
During the period from 15th August 1947 to 17th September 1948, thousands of Hindus had left their houses and crossed into the Indian territory due to the Razakkar menace. Arya Samaj had set up camps for such refugees in places like Sholapur, Pandarpur, Barsi, Bijapur, Umaarkhade, Buldhana, Amaravathi and Vijayawada and every possible help was given to them.

Pandit Vinayak Rao was the president of the Lawyer's Protest Committee. He collected authentic information about the Razakar atrocities and sent a report to New Delhi and therefore was arrested. Swami Swathantra Nandji worked as Field Marshal and accredited lieutenant of Mahatma Narayan Swamiji. He arranged and managed the Satyagraha camps most efficiently and with exemplary tact and perseverance.
When Hyderabad declared Independence, K.Joshi, printed a pamphlet making clear the intentions of the majority community in Hyderabad. The extracts are as follows, 

"Hyderabad cannot suppress the democratic aspirations of the people any longer. In this age of
democracy it is an admitted fact that sovereignty rests with the people. Hyderabad cannot be an exception to this rule... The people of Hyderabad cannot be politically isolated from the rest of India. Hyderabad groans under the heels of feudal bureaucracy today. It is politically backward and economically poor. The standard of literacy is very low. There is no freedom of speech in the state... Responsible government is the only panacea to these evils."

These are the people who laid down their lives fighting the oppressive rule of Nizam of Hyderabad.
1. Shyamlal
2. Ram
3. Mahdav Rao
4. Swami Kalyan Sen
5. Malkan Singh
6. Dharm Prakash
7. Pandurang
8. Shanthi Prakash
9. Lakhsman Rao
l0..Bhakt Arora
11. Nandu Singh
12.BadanSingh
13.Chotelal
14. Fakhir Chand
15.Bheem Rao
16. Arjun Singh
17.Baidnath
18. Dayanand
19.Radhakrishna
20. Mahadev
21. Paramanand
22. Vishnu Bhagvad
23.Satyanand
24. Ved Prakash
25. Ramnath
26. Dharm Prakash
27.Purushotham
28. Venkat Rao
29. Mathu Ram
30.Govind Rao
31.RathiRam
32. Tarachand
33. Ashrafi Lai
34. Manick Rao
35. Mahadev
36. Satyanarayana
37. Brahmachary
38.Narasingh

Source : Brahmadatt Snathak's



For the first time after 48 years the Hyderabad Satyagrahis werehonoured in an Aryan Conference in Ajmer. A long number of people gathered from different parts of India. Brahmadatt Santhak speaking on this occasion said,

"2,500 Satyagrahis were nominated by him for awarding them pension as freedom fighters. But
only 50 out of them have started receiving pensions"


The account of Pandit Narenderji, one of the stalwarts of the Arya Samaj movement in his autobiography titled, "Jeevan Ki Doop Chaav" gives a vivid picture of the conditions in the Hyderabad state during Osman Ali Khan's rule.Pandit Narendraji's association with Hyderabad government began from the time his father took up service in the Nizam's administration. His family
served the Nizam faithfully and therefore they were given the rank of Mansabdar. But after the death of his father, he was not allowed to inherent this privilege on the grounds of some accusations made against him. Nawab Fakiyar Jung Bahadur representing the government wrote to him stating that even after warning he was working against the Nizam's rules and regulations. When he asked for the right of Mansabdari, the Nawab replied,

"Don't fight the Nizam but write an apology letter and then you will get it back".
But Narendra was not willing to beg. He decided to find a purpose in life. He said,
"Troubles always make you more experienced. For achieving every good work you need to take the path of thorns. You should not be worried about the sun and shade in life".

It was during this time that a man by name Siddiq Deendhar claiming to be a reincarnation of Lingayat sect addressed a number of meetings in Hubli, Darwar, Mysore, Gulbarga and Raichur. He met the lingayats and also other Hindus and was on the job of converting them to Muslims. He had the backing of the Nizam. Deendhar wrote a book "Sanare Aallaam " in which he ridiculed Yogeshwara Krishna and the Hindu goddesses. He told the Muslims,

"The Muslims may be less in number but the ruler is a Muslim so don't worry, you will be on top. The Muslims will be ultimately successful".
To counter Deendhar, Pandit Ramachandra Dehalviji from Delhi came to Hyderabad in 1929. Chandulal the head of the Arya Samaj invited him as he was well versed in Quran. He spoke at length to large gatherings for five days. He exhorted "Don't get scared, be bold". He spoke on the topics like
Atma,Paramatma, Materialism and Vedic Religion. He spoke vehemently against caste system.

Pandit Narendraji bought the Satyarth Prakash in Urdu and began to read it. He found the job in Sarfe Khas land administration office for a salary of Rs.50/- per month. The first thing he did with his salary was to become a member of Arya Samaj by paying a membership fee of 25 paise.
He got so involved in the work of Arya Samaj and resolved to remain single. He was greatly influenced by the speeches of the great orator Pandit Chandra Banu, an expert in Vedic principles when he came to Hyderabad in 1930. With the initiative taken by him Narandraji was sent to study in an ashram in Lahore.
The first time Pandit Narendra participated in Satyagraha was in 1932 when Mahatma started his fast unto death in the Yeravada Jail against the 'Harijan Award' introduced by British which was intended to create rift between Hindus and Muslims.He came back to Hyderabad in 1933. When he was asked
to address a gathering he spoke on to "Quran me Vaidon Ka Tej". It caused a great impact on people. He along with the number of prominent Arya Samaj leaders of Hyderabad went to Halikhed to participate in a gathering addressed by Dehalviji. This gave a fresh lease of life to Hindus. The author also spoke on the topic, "Paap se daro, paapi se nahee" (fear sin not the sinner). It had a great impact on the youth especially to fight the attrocities of the Nizam's rule.It was during the three day Nizam State Conference that the decision to start the Weekly Paper "Vaidek Adarsh" (Principles of Vedas) was taken. He was given the responsibility to bring out the first edition of the Vaidek Adarsh.
It became very popular.
On 18' April 1935 a notice was given by the Nizam's Government to him asking him to show cause why no action should be taken against him. The Vaidek Adarsh had boldly exposed the atrocities of the Nizam's Government.The Muslim papers started propaganda against him. The Nizam slammed a ban on all his writings and speeches . Pandit Narendra also worked as the President of Arya Samaj for four years. The Government was disturbed by the growing number of Arya Samaj followers, which reached 50,000 by 1935, and they started putting a lot of pressure on the Arya Samaj. Narendraji continued to address a number of meetings especially for the youth which greatly irked the Government. For this he was sentenced to six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs.200/-.

In 1938, a procession was organised by the Arya Samaj on the occasion of Holi. At the instance of two lawyers, Pasha Miya and Mohmmed Saheb, the Muslims started attacking the peaceful Arya Samaj procession. There were clashes and causalities on both sides. The Arya Samajists were sentenced to jail for abetting violence. According to Narendraji, while in jail one of them,

Shyamlalji became very ill and the doctor prescribed medicine to which the assistant Jailor mixed poison and he died. There were many times he escaped death narrowly in his valiant struggle
against the Nizam's oppresive rule. While attending the conference in Jadcherla, there was an attempt on his life. Suddenly a youth from the back seat of his car tried to kill him with a revolver, but he escaped by the skin of his teeth.
The Nizam's Government had a strict surveillance on him and his activities. All the letters written by him from prison and also from his home were scrutinized by the Government. On another occasion while he was returning from Nizamsagar, during the night, two youths who were hiding fired
at the vehicle he was traveling. Shri Ganga Ram, an Advocate who was traveling with him was hurt and was bleeding. But Narendra narrowly escaped as the bullet brushed the Gandhian Cap he was wearing. Narendra was actively involved in the call for "Join India Movement" given by Swami Ramanand Thirtha in August 1947. When the Nizam refused to accede to the Indian Union. After integration, he contested in the first General Elections representing the Congress Party and became an M.L.A. His yeomen services to the State of Hyderabad can never be forgotten.

A special mention must be made of Narayan Rao Pawar who was called the daredevil of Hyderabad. Narayan Rao Pawar immortalized his name in the history of freedom struggle in Hyderabad by sending shock waves down the spine of the then mighty seventh Nizam, Mir Osman Ali Khan, by making an assassination bid. He was an Arya Samaj activist and was one of the suicide squad of three - Gangaram, Jagdish and Pawar. They were armed with four bombs, two revolvers and a bottle of poison each. They wanted to attack the Nizam when he went on his customary drive in the evening from King Kothi to Mecca Masjid. He positioned himself in the All-Saints lane and Gangaram at Boggulkunta and Jagdish a little further down.

As the Nizam's car turned the corner he pulled a bomb and charged out of the lane pushing a police constable stationed there to make his way towards the speeding car. As a quirk of fate would have it, the bomb missed the target and hurt five others. The next moment the police constable pounced on him, held his arms while another kicked at his ribs, immobilizing him with pain. After that he could neither throw another bomb or consume poison. The Nizam returned to King Kothi, foiling even the attempts of his two other friends who were waiting for the convoy. Pawar was 21 then, and working as a lawyer at the High Court. He was greatly inspired by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who said, "Give me blood and I will give you freedom ". Their plan was to eliminate Mir Osman Ali Khan and then bank on the prospect of pitting his two sons Azam Jah and Moazzam Jah against each other for the throne and hoped the resulting chaos would give an excuse to Sardar Patel to send the Indian army.

Pawar was charged under various laws including waging a war against the King and sentenced to imprisonment. The punishment was death and Gangaram was given life imprisonment. When questioned on how he faced the trial, he replied, "It was an agonizing experience. The police tortured
me, but the judiciary was polite. The sessions court itself appointed a lawyer for me, who asked me to
change my statement that I threw the bomb only to bring the issue of levy to the Nizam and not to kill
him. But I refused to do so." About the story of his release he said, "It is a long story. The Nizam was about to execute the death sentence on me in the second week of September 1948. But the Police Action stopped it and General Choudhary commuted it to life imprisonment. But it took the Congress regime a year to release me unconditionally on August 10 1949. The Congress leaders were under tremendous public pressure. Swami Ramanand Thirtha reluctantly agreed to my release. It took them one more year to remove my name from the black list prepared by the Nizam." * 

Asked about the treatment meted out to him after the fall of Nizam he said, "The new government led by Congress leaders treated me as a militant and as one against 'ahimsa'. They had to release me unconditionally from jail only after Pandit Narendraji brought pressure on the government."

He says,"It was only the visit of Sardar Patel to the city which brought light into my life. Following his initiative on August 10, 1949,1 walked out into a free world and an independent country in my dreams." In the article, "A Tryst With Destiny", V.H.Desai asks, "How far have we fulfilled our pledge to take our country forward on the path of freedom and progress?
Year after year we go out to welcome this day with crowded memories of our long struggle for freedom. But memory should not be a burden of the past but an inspiration for the future. Indeed India's struggle for independence was not just a negative movement but a rigorous course of spiritual education. This education which shaped the soul of our fighting patriot to the divine mould of Truth and Non-violence is the pathway to India's destiny... It is high time we awake to life and protect our hard won freedom as we have yet another tryst with destiny; to make our country the leading light
of the world."

The above matter is collected from excerpts of the interview which was published in the Deccan Chronicle, August 15, 1997  and an interview which appeared in Indian Express, September 12. 1998, Special Supplement, p.I.The Hindustan Times August 15lh 1992 .p.7

Thus the role of Arya Samaj as a pressure group in Hyderabad state cannotbe underestimated. They took active part in keeping up the ideals of the Arya Samaj till the end. They were not provocative but when intimidated they would not take it lying down. They were not going to meekly accept the growing injustice and oppressive rule of the Hyderabad state especially against the majority. At no stage could they be sidelined. They were able through their 1938 Satyagraha make the unjust
highhanded rule public and national. They took active part in the politics as well as in religious and social revival of the society. The frustrations of the majority community had become so high that the leaders were willing to pay any price in order to change the existing order. Arya Samaj preached equality of all human beings and stressed in equal opportunities. They realized that this was lacking in Hyderabad. Though some scholars blamed the Arya Samaj for becoming militant and inciting communal passion, the Samajists justified their action by stating that they had no choice. Their initiative of setting up refugees camps in the face of Razakkar menace made them popular. Thus
their part in helping the integration of Hyderabad into the Indian Union cannot be ignored.


Eminent writer scholar Shri K.M.Munshi on Swami Dayanand

Eminent writer, scholar Shri K.M.Munshi on Swami Dayanand

Of the modern Masters, Swami Dayananda Saraswati is the first in time.

He had no attachment, no personal life and no fear. He braved poison and snakes and the knife of the assassin. He faced abuse, calumny and violence with undaunted courage, and a spotless life; and the concentrated vigour of a complete consecration to his mission. He ha...d no malice, but his flaming indignation was like scorching lava, which burnt up untruth and things which stifled the soul of India.

The Swami wonderful gifts were brought under the direction of one idea, to restore the primitive Aryan strength and virility to Indian Culture. He was learned beyond the measure of man. He was a master of thundering eloquence. Ceaselessly he worked, travelling all over India, radiating intense creative vigour; a powerful human dynamo, physically, mentally and spiritually. He was the first among modems who lived and taught others to live up to the permanent values of our Culture. He gave us the first programme of Cultural reintegration. Most of which has now been associated with Nationalism removal of caste distinction and untouchability, and equality of women; highest scientific education grafted on an education essentially Indian; the use of national language and the pursuit of Sanskrit as a predominant national influence; repudiation of Westernism; reorganization of life on a basis of freedom as in Vedic times and a sturdy resistance against foreign rule and alien culture.
‘India, Madame Blavatsky said, saw no greater scholar, metaphysician, orator and denunciator of evil since Shankracharya.

As a representative of the creative art of life in modern times he stands supreme; a spirit of titanic stature through which worked the force of an immense creative power.

(Reference- The Creative Art of life- 1946)

Shri Shyamji Krishna Varma A Tribute



Tribute to the proud son of India Shri Shyamji Krishna Varma on his death anniversary on 30th March

Dr Vivek Arya


Early Life and Education

Shyamaji Krishna Varma was born on 4th October, 1857 in Mandvi, a province in Kutch, Gujarat. He was the son of Karsan Bhanushali, a laborer for Cotton Press Company and Gomatibai, his mother who died when Shyamaji was only eleven years old. Shyamji Krishna Varma was then raised by his grandmother. He had his primary education in the village school at Mandvi and thereafter completed his secondary education in Bhuj. He went to Mumbai for further education at Wilson High School where he learnt Sanskrit. Here in Mumbai, he acquired the knowledge of Sanskrit language in great depth from Shashtri Vishvanath and mastered the language. In 1875 Shyamaji Krishna Varma got married to a daughter of a wealthy businessman. Her name was Bhanumati and hailed from the Bhatia community.
He in contact with Swami Dayananda Saraswati, who was a nationalist, a radical reformer and an exponent of Vedas. Swami Dayanand Saraswati was the founder of Arya Samaj. Shyamji Krishna Varma became his disciple and was soon found conducting lectures on Vedic Philosophy and Religion. In 1877, Shyamji toured all over India propagating the philosophy of Vedas. These tours secured him a great public recognition all over India and many prominent scholars admired him for his knowledge and speeches. Such great was the influence of Swami Dayanand Saraswati on his life that his work was being remarked and applauded by all. He soon moved forward to associate with Bombay Arya Samaj.

He became the first non-Brahmin in Modern India /to receive the prestigious title of "Pandit" by the Pandits of Kashi. He came to the attention of Professor Monier Williams, an Oxford Professor of Sanskrit who offered Shyamaji a job as his assistant. On 25th April, 1879, Shyamji arrived in England and joined Balliol College, Oxford with the recommendation of Professor Monier Williams as an assistant professor in Sanskrit.

In 1881 he was sent by the Secretary of State for India to represent the learning of his country at Berlin Congress of Orientalists. There he not only read his own paper on the subject of "Sanskrit as a Living Language of India", but also he read and translated a patriotic Sanskrit poem sent by RamDas Sena, a learned Zamindar of Behrampur. It is believed that this recital of patriotic poem might have created the spark of patriotism in Shyamji Krishna Varma.

In 1883, he cleared his B.A. and presented a lecture on The Origin of Writing in India to the Royal Asiatic Society. The presentation was very well received and as a consequence he was elected a non-resident member of the society.

In 1885 he returned to India, enrolled himself as an advocate of Bombay High Court and started his practice. He later moved on and served for a short time as Diwan of Ratlam. His ill health made him retire early from this post with some gratuity for his service - which he invested in to cotton press mills to earn assured income. After a short period of stay in Bombay (now Mumbai), he settled in Ajmer which was also the headquarters of his Guru, Swami Dayanand Saraswati. He started practicing at the British Court in Ajmer and earned his fame as an advocate. During his stay here, he became a member of the Municipality of Ajmer city, and also served as Diwan of Ajmer. He also served the Maharaja of Udaipur as a council member from 1893 to 1895 followed by the position of Diwan of Junagadh State. Somewhere in 1897, a bitter experience with a British agent shook his faith in the British rule. He was moved to dedicate the rest of his life to fight the British rule.


Nationalism and Social Reforms

Shyamji Krishna Varma was highly impressed with the work of Shri Lokmanya Tilak.He fully supported Tilak during the consent of Age Bill Controversy of 1890. Shyamji initiated very friendly relations with Tilak, which inspired him to the Nationalist Movement in the next decade. The timid and futile cooperative policy of Congress Party did not appeal to Shyamji. He dejected the petitioning, praying, protesting, cooperating and collaborating policy of the Congress Party, which he considered undignified and shameful.

In 1897, the atrocities inflicted during the plague crisis in Poona on Indians by the British Government, stunned and shocked Shyamji. At this point in life, he felt full justification for the Nationalist stand taken by Nathu brothers and Tilak. When he saw them sentenced to a barbarous imprisonment he saw his future too ending up in jail like others. His immediate decision was to give up his lucrative career and to immigrate to England with a view to carry out the freedom fight from abroad. He had only one business in mind - training and inspiring the young sons and daughters of India to strive for the liberty of their Motherland.

He decided to dedicate all his money, time, scholarship, literary power and above all his life to serve his Motherland selflessly. He deliberately intended to launch uncompromising propaganda and to create support in England and Europe for the independence of India.


Life and Work in England


Upon his arrival in London, he stayed at the Inner Temple and
studied Herbert Spencer's writings in his spare time. In 1900 he bought an expensive house in HighGate. His home became a base for all political leaders of India. Gandhiji, Lenin, Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, and many more visited him to discuss the Indian Independence Movement. Avoiding the Indian National Congress, he kept in contact with rationalists, free thinkers, national and social democrats, socialists, Irish republicans, etc.

In 1898, when a free press defence committee was formed in order to resist police attack upon liberty of all opinions Shyamji subscribed generously to its funds.

Shyamji was a great admirer of Herbert Spencer's philosophy and he accepted him as his guru. Herbert Spencer died 14th December 1903 and in his honour Shyamji established an annual lectureship at Oxford for the sum of £1000. In addition, he endowed five Herbert Spencer Indian fellowships, each valued at Rs. 2,000 and a Swami Dayanand fellowship. He also established many other fellowships in honour of great Indians.

In 1905, Shyamji embarked on a new career as a full-fledged propagandalist. He made his debut by publishing the first issue of his English monthly "The Indian Sociologist" - an organ of freedom and of political, social and religious reform. This powerful ideological monthly served a great purpose in uplifting the mass against British rule and encouraged many more intellectual revolutionaries in India and abroad to fight for the freedom of India. On 18th February 1905, Shyamji inaugurated a new organisation called "The Indian Home Rule Society". The first meeting for the same was held at Shyamji's residence at HighGate and the meeting unanimously decided to found "The Indian Home Rule Society" with the object of:

--Securing home rule for India

--Carrying on propaganda in England by all practical means with a view to attain the same
-
-Spreading among the people of India knowledge of freedom and National unity

India House

As many Indian students faced racist attitudes when seeking accommodations, he founded India House as a hostel for Indian students, based at 65, Cromwell Avenue, Highgate. This living accommodation for 25 students was formally inaugurated on 1st July by Henry Hyndman, of the Social Democratic Federation, in the presence of Dadabhai Naoroji, Lala Lajpat Rai, Madam Cama, Mr. Swinney (of the London Positivist Society), Mr. Harry Quelch (the editor of the Social Democratic Federation's Justice) and Charlotte Despard, the Irish Republican and suffragette.
Declaring India House open, Hyndman remarked, As things stand, loyalty to Great Britain means treachery to India. The institution of this India House means a great step in that direction of Indian growth and Indian emancipation, and some of those who are here this afternoon may live to witness the fruits of its triumphant success. Shyamji hoped India House would incubate Indian revolutionaries and create great patriotic revolutionaries by implementing his ideology for the freedom of India. He succeeded in his vision and he produced the greatest revolutionaries such as Krantivir Vinayak Savarkar, Hardayalji, etc. Gandhiji stayed at India House on his visit to England in 1906. Despite differing views on how to free India, Shyamji and Gandhiji's relationship was friendly until 1909 when the justified assassination of William Curzon-Wyllie at the hands of the great martyr Madanlal Dhingra occurred.

Shyamji's activities in England remained highly volcanic and inflammatory to British Government. The power of his pen shook the whole British Empire and they became highly suspicious of him. Shyamji realised that British Secret Services closely watched his movements and so he decided to move his headquarters to Paris leaving India House in the hands of his disciple Vir Savarkar. Shyamji left Britain secretly before the British Government tried to arrest him.


Life and Work in Paris

He arrived in Paris in early 1911 and continued his work vigorously. The British media still remained highly critical of him and tried to use their influence in French media circle. The British government tried to extradite him from France with no success. Shyamji's name was dragged into the most sensational trial of Mr. Merlin, an Englishmen, at Bows Court for writing an article in "liberators" published by Shyamji's friend, Mr. James. Shyamji's work in Paris helped gain support for Indian Independence from European countries. He agitated for the release of Savarker and acquired great support all over Europe and Russia. Guy Aldred wrote an article in the Daily Herald under the heading of Savarker the Hindu Patriot whose sentences expire on 24th December 1960 , helping create support in England too. As the presence of an Indian nationalist in Paris would be seriously jeopardised by the outbreak of a European war and the visit of King George to Paris in 1950 to set a final seal of Entente Cordiale, Shyamji foresaw the fate and shifted his headquarters to Geneva.

Here the Swiss government imposed political restrictions during the entire period of World War I. He kept in touch with his contacts but he could not support them directly. He spent time with Dr. Briess, president of the Pro India Committee in Geneva. Shyamji was later shocked and heartbroken when he found out that Dr. Briess was a paid secret agent of the British Government, as well as the treachery of his old friend. This event left a deep scar in his heart but his support to the cause remained at his heart throughout.


Sad Demise

In the wake of World War I, Shyamji had moved his headquarters to Geneva in 1914. Due to the outbreak of war, Shyamji stopped the publication of "Indian Sociologist" and resumed publication in 1920. His last two issues of "Indian Sociologist", as per his wish, were to be taken as his last will and testament of his work. After several health problems, the great patriot, Shyamji Krishna Varma, passed away on 30th March 1930 far away from his beloved Motherland.

News of his death was suppressed by the British government in India. Nevertheless tributes were paid to him by Sardar Bhagat Singh and his co-revolutionist brothers in Lahore Jail where they were undergoing a long-term drawn out trial. Maratha, a daily newspaper started by Shri Tilak in Marathi, paid very touching tribute to him as a great revolutionary.


Pandit Shyamaji Krishna Varma did not live to witness the independence of Bharat, but his efforts, conviction and confidence of India gaining its freedom from British rule in future was strong and unshakable as he made the prepaid arrangements with the local government of Geneva, Ville de Geneve, and St Georges cemetery to preserve his and his wife's ashes (Asthis) at the cemetery for one hundred years and to send their urns to India whenever it becomes independent during that period.

Shri Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat State, finally succeeded in returning the urns of Pandit Shyamaji and his wife Bhanumati on August 22, 2003 - fifty five years after Indian Independence.

#ShyamjiKrishnaVarma

Inputs from http://www.krantiteerth.org/about-shyamji-krishna-verma.html